In the demanding and often dangerous world of industrial work, your hands are your most valuable tools. Protecting them from various hazards, especially punctures, is paramount. But with a dizzying array of gloves claiming "puncture resistance," how do you actually choose the right level of protection? This article will delve into the basics of puncture resistance in industrial gloves, exploring the rating systems, their differences, and how to make an informed decision for your specific tasks.
Why Puncture Resistance Matters
From handling sharp metal scraps to working with needles, the risk of a puncture wound is ever-present in many industries. A simple puncture can lead to:
- Pain and Injury: Immediate discomfort and potential for deep tissue damage.
- Infection: Open wounds are breeding grounds for bacteria.
- Lost Time and Productivity: Recovery means time away from work, impacting efficiency.
- Contamination: In medical or food handling settings, a puncture can contaminate products.
Choosing gloves with appropriate puncture resistance isn't just about comfort; it's about safety, health, and productivity.
The Rating Systems: ANSI/ISEA 105 vs. EN 388
ANSI/ISEA 105 and EN 388 are two of the most widely recognized standards for rating the mechanical risks of work gloves. While they both assess puncture resistance, their testing methods and classification systems have key differences.
Testing Method
Both standards use a similar test to measure blunt puncture resistance against objects like nails or metal splinters. This involves a universal testing machine with a probe (a stylus 4.5 mm in diameter with a rounded 1 mm tip) that pushes into a glove material sample at a constant speed, measuring the force in newtons required to puncture it.
The main difference is that the ANSI/ISEA 105 standard also includes an additional test for hypodermic needle puncture resistance using a much finer 25-gauge needle. This second test addresses puncture hazards in specific industries, such as medical, sanitation, and recycling. EN 388 does not have a separate test for hypodermic needles.
Classification and Ratings
Both standards use a numerical scale, but the number of levels and the force ranges differ.
ANSI/ISEA 105
- Scale: Uses a 1-5 scale for blunt puncture resistance.
- Range: The ratings are based on the force required for puncture, from 10 Newtons (N) for Level 1 to 150+ N for Level 5.
- Needle Puncture: The separate hypodermic needle test also has its own 1-5 rating scale, with Level 5 resisting 10+ N of force.
EN 388
- Scale: Uses a 1-4 scale for blunt puncture resistance.
- Range: The ratings are based on the force required, from 20 N for Level 1 to 100+ N for Level 4.
Key Takeaways
ANSI/ISEA 105
- Offers a more granular 5-level rating scale for blunt punctures.
- Includes a separate, crucial test and rating for hypodermic needle punctures. This makes it a more comprehensive standard for workers facing fine-point hazards.
- The standard is voluntary and is widely used in the United States and North America.
EN 388
- Uses a concise 4-level rating scale for blunt punctures.
- The test method is not designed to assess protection against fine, sharp objects like hypodermic needles, which is an important limitation to remember.
- This is the primary standard for gloves in Europe but is also recognized and used internationally.
Why the Difference Matters
While both standards evaluate similar hazards (cut, abrasion, puncture, tear, impact), the different methodologies and scales mean a direct conversion between the two is not possible.
- A high rating under one standard does not automatically mean the same performance under the other.
- It is crucial to understand the specific standard and rating on the glove to accurately assess its protective qualities.
ANSI Puncture Resistance Levels: A Simple Breakdown
The ANSI/ISEA 105 standard provides a classification system for the puncture resistance of gloves, measuring how much force is required for a blunt probe to pierce the material. This scale helps you select the appropriate hand protection for specific tasks and environments. The ratings range from A1 to A5, with higher levels indicating greater resistance. The testing is done using a 4.5mm steel stylus that resembles a ballpoint pen.
Here's a simplified guide to the ANSI Puncture Resistance levels:
Puncture Resistance Scale (A1-A5)
|
Puncture Resistance Level |
Force Rating (in Newtons) |
Typical Environments & Materials |
| A1 | 10-19 N | Light material handling, general assembly, landscaping, and warehouse work where risks of puncturing are minimal. Typical threats include thorns or light tools. |
| A2 | 20-59 N |
Light-duty construction, small parts assembly, and handling of materials with small burrs or sharp edges. Examples include small screws, nails, or metal fragments. |
| A3 | 60-99 N |
Packaging, moderate material handling, and general industrial work where there is a risk of a puncture from sharp objects. Examples include handling cartons with staples or moderate-sized tools. |
| A4 | 100-149 N |
Sheet metal handling, general industrial work, and applications where a higher level of protection is needed. Examples include working with sheet metal or sharp machine parts. |
| A5 | 150 + N | Heavy industrial work, demolition, and high-risk environments with significant puncture hazards. Examples include handling scrap metal, broken glass, or other heavy, sharp materials. |
Always err on the side of caution. If there's uncertainty, choose a higher level of protection.
Beyond the Ratings: Other Considerations
- Dexterity: Higher puncture resistance often comes with thicker materials, potentially reducing dexterity. Balance protection with the need for fine motor skills.
- Grip: Ensure the glove material and coating provide adequate grip for the tasks, especially in oily or wet conditions.
- Comfort and Fit: Ill-fitting or uncomfortable gloves are less likely to be worn consistently, negating their protective benefits.
- Other Hazards: Don't forget other potential hazards like cuts, abrasions, chemicals, or extreme temperatures. Many gloves offer multi-hazard protection.
- Durability: How long will the gloves last in your specific work environment? Consider tear and abrasion resistance.
Conclusion
Understanding puncture resistance ratings is a critical step towards creating a safer work environment. By differentiating between the ANSI and EN 388 standards and carefully assessing your specific hazards, you can confidently select gloves that provide the right level of protection for your hands. Remember, the best glove is the one that's worn, so prioritize fit, comfort, and comprehensive protection to keep your most valuable tools safe and productive.
goSafe offers a wide variety of Hand Protection suitable for every task imaginable. Contact Us for more information about our Hand Protection selections or any questions related to safety and safety-related products.
For more information about Hand Protection, including Cut, Abrasion, Impact, and Puncture resistance, as well as Palm Coatings, Fit & Function, and overall Cost Effectiveness, please Click Here.
goSafe: Your Partner in Safety
At goSafe, Safety is our ONLY focus - and we'll partner with you to keep you and your teams safe. We're small enough to handle your local projects, yet large enough to serve national accounts. If safety is your mission, it starts with us.
Watch the video below for more information about goSafe's capabilities.
