Cut Protection 101: Understanding the Basics

In the demanding world of industrial work, our hands are our most valuable tools. From handling sharp metals to intricate machinery, the risk of cuts is ever-present. That's why understanding the levels of cut protection provided by gloves isn't just good practice – it's crucial for safety and productivity.

This article will break down the essentials of cut protection, focusing on the widely used ASTM/ANSI 105 standard, contrasting it with the EN388 system, and guiding you on how to choose the right gloves for the job.

The Science Behind the Shield: How Cut Protection is Measured

When you see a glove boasting "cut-resistant," what does that actually mean? It refers to the glove's ability to withstand a sharp object under pressure. Two primary international standards are used to measure this resistance: ASTM/ANSI 105 and EN388.

ASTM/ANSI 105: The American Standard for Cut Protection

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) developed the ASTM/ANSI 105 standard, which is prevalent in North America. This system uses a TDM-100 machine to measure the force required for a blade to cut through a glove material. The result is expressed in grams, and then assigned a letter grade from A1 to A9.

Here's a simplified breakdown of the ANSI Cut Level system:

EN388: The European Standard for Mechanical Risks

The EN388 standard is the European equivalent and is more broadly focused on mechanical risks, including abrasion, tear, puncture, and cut resistance. For cut resistance, EN388 historically used a "Coupe Test" where a circular blade moved back and forth across the material. This test yields a number from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest.

However, a significant update to EN388 in 2016 introduced a TDM-100 test (similar to ANSI) for higher cut levels, indicated by an "X" or a letter (A-F) after the initial four digits, specifically for materials that dull the Coupe Test blade. This means a glove might have an EN388 rating like "4X42F," where "F" represents a very high cut resistance as per the TDM-100 test.

Key Differences Between ASTM/ANSI 105 and EN388

The primary difference lies in the testing methodology and the granularity of the rating.

• ASTM/ANSI 105 focuses solely on cut resistance using the TDM-100 machine, offering a more precise, nine-level scale (A1-A9).
• EN388 provides a broader assessment of mechanical risks. While its initial cut test (Coupe Test) is less precise for higher cut levels, the updated standard with the TDM-100 test for higher levels (indicated by letters A-F) now offers a closer comparison to ANSI.

It's important to note that while efforts are made to harmonize these standards, a direct conversion isn't always perfect due to slight variations in testing procedures and blade types.

Choosing the Right Cut Protection: A Strategic Approach

Selecting the appropriate cut protection isn't a "one-size-fits-all" scenario. It requires a careful assessment of three key factors:

1. Environment:
   • Are you working with dry or oily materials? Some cut-resistant materials lose effectiveness when saturated with oil.
   • Is there a risk of puncture in addition to cuts? Consider gloves with combined cut and puncture resistance.
   • Are there extreme temperatures? The glove material needs to withstand the environment without compromising protection.
2. Material Being Handled:
   • What is the sharpness of the material? (e.g., sheet metal, glass, plastic, wood)
   • What is the weight and size of the material? Heavier, larger materials increase the risk of deeper cuts.
   • Are there burrs or rough edges? Even seemingly dull materials can cause severe cuts if they have sharp burrs.
3. Cut Level Required:
   • Perform a thorough risk assessment. Identify all potential cut hazards in the task.
   • Consider the force and direction of potential contact. Is it a glancing blow or direct pressure?
   • Err on the side of caution. If in doubt, choose a higher cut level. It's always better to be overprotected than underprotected.

Real-World Application: Matching Gloves to Tasks

Let's put this into practice:

• For light assembly work with minimal sharp edges, an ANSI A1 or A2 glove might suffice, offering basic protection and good dexterity.
• When handling general construction materials like wood or concrete, where incidental contact with rough edges is possible, an ANSI A3 or A4 glove would be a good choice.
• Working with sheet metal, glass, or in automotive manufacturing often necessitates ANSI A5 or A6 gloves due to the high risk of severe lacerations.
• Specialized tasks in industries like demolition or heavy fabrication that involve razor-sharp materials and extreme forces may require ANSI A7, A8, or A9 gloves for maximum protection.

The Bottom Line: Safety First

Understanding cut protection levels is not just about compliance; it's about safeguarding the hands that drive our industries. By carefully assessing the risks and choosing gloves with the appropriate ASTM/ANSI 105 or EN388 rating, you're not just buying a piece of equipment – you're investing in the well-being and productivity of your workforce. Stay informed, stay protected, and keep those hands safe!

goSafe offers a wide variety of Hand Protection suitable for every task imaginable. Contact Us for more information about our Hand Protection selections or any questions related to safety and safety-related products.

For more information about Hand Protection, including Cut, Abrasion, Impact, and Puncture resistance, as well as Palm Coatings, Fit & Function, and overall Cost Effectiveness, please Click Here.

goSafe: Your Partner in Safety

At goSafe, Safety is our ONLY focus - and we'll partner with you to keep you and your teams safe. We're small enough to handle your local projects, yet large enough to serve national accounts. If safety is your mission, it starts with us.

Watch the video below for more information about goSafe's capabilities.